Technology Advisory Council Technology Advisory Council Technology Advisory Council Technology Advisory Council Technology Advisory Council Technology Advisory Council
Skip to main contentCal State San Bernardino
Technology Advisory Council Technology Advisory Council Technology Advisory Council
Home
Committee Roster
Minutes From Meetings
Baseline Configurations
Achievments (Annual Report)
Technology Advisory Council Technology Advisory Council Technology Advisory Council Technology Advisory Council Technology Advisory Council
Technology Advisory Council
Technology Advisory Council
 

See All Minutes

Technology Advisory Council Meeting Minutes - Friday, May 17, 2002
1:15 p.m. in PL-002

Attendees: Javier Torner, Kurt Collins, Jim Monaghan, Joe Scarcella, Bill Takehara, Jeffrey Hicks, Kim Cousins, Mike Ross, Ian Jacobs

Announcements - It was announced that there is $27,000 left in the BATS budget. There were several proposals for that money. One idea was to fund Meeting Maker and up the number of licenses. Another thought regarding Meeting Maker was to fund part of the licenses and have the departments fund the balance. Another was to roll the money over to fund next year's new initiatives.

BATS 01-02 Expenditures - ($330,548 baseline + $240,000 lottery = $570,548)

Workstations (367 machines @ $627 each)

$230,000

Smart Classrooms

$120,000

Help Desk

$50,000

Computer Associates Virus Package

$14,000

Mobile Lab (new initiative)

$62,000

Citrix Server Software (new initiative)

$65,000


TOTAL

$542,000

Balance

$29,548

New Initiatives - DCS has purchased another Citrix server - Mary Moya and Lorraine Frost to get the system going as a test case bought 25 additional licenses. Citrix as a web interface: Try with students and evaluate at the end of each quarter. Do a presentation to students to be ready by the end of next fall. Criteria would be to cut back on the number of computers the campus buys. How many students using computers are from home/off campus/on campus? Encourage off campus use. Get feedback/satisfaction. $65,000 - 5 boxes purchased. 4 for Citrix file server bought another server as test box. Each box $5,000 - 25 licenses per box - up to 40-60 per box. 200 licenses on hardware.

Implementation of GTC the week of June 3, 60 hours of onsite support by Citrix with testing to go on all summer long. The Citrix Server will be available after June 3 and the committee will have access to test. Fall has been targeted as the rollout date. Success will be based on usage stats. Stats are to include on and off campus usage. There are already at least three populations that plan to use Citrix during the pilot; by necessity this should be a controlled group.

Three quotes for a mobile lab came in under budget. $65,000 was allocated, the cost was $62,000, everything has been ordered. There was some concern that the laptop project did not already have a similar population ready to use it.

Web Server Policy - BATS Web Server documentation has been written, procedures drafted. It will downloaded on the BATS website. The discussion on the web server policy was renewals once a year via email. Reports can be run on a weekly basis to see who is about to expire. The main page should be up to date along with the links. Renewal replies were suggested the week of convocation with a two week grace period. This would apply to BATS servers only, not the entire campus. All front pages should look alike and be ADA compliant. The webmaster has software to make all pages uniform. There should be a disclaimer when signing off from the site. There was a concern of whether legal counsel should be obtained for liability of "reasonable accommodation". Instruction is available. Blackboard is not ADA compliant. The internal pages would need to be compliant. It was suggested that David DeMauro, V.P. Admin. & Finance and Elizabeth Walter, legal counsel from the Chancellor's Office be contacted for their input.

Meeting Maker Update - Meeting Maker is not dealing with the CSU as a whole, only on an individual basis. The option would be to change to software such as Outlook and iPlanet; these are available at no cost. There are approximately 500 people using meeting maker on campus. Brent at Meeting Maker quoted $14,000 per year for a three year contract to maintain the 1000 licensed that we currently have. There is an average of 300-400 people logged in. Suggestions included seeing if all departments want to stay with the Meeting Maker contract. President Karnig wants standardization, but uses Outlook. Another suggestion would be for BATS to match funds and pay for ½ and have each department pay the other half. It was pointed out that very few faculty use Meeting Maker. The new version would connect to LDAP and if someone didn't have an account, it would send an email invitation. There was discussion on where the funding of Meeting Maker should come. It was pointed out that there is no central funding available. If it is not renewed there will be no upgrades or support. Data Center Services administers Meeting Maker. It was agreed to extend 1 year and no more and Drs. Aguilar & Fernandez should be notified. Jeff Hicks is to get a quote for a one year contract for next Friday's BATS meeting.

2002-2003 Budget - It is understood that the Technology budget is to be cut therefore eliminating BATS' $330,000 baseline. Bill Takehara will update BATS at the next meeting.

TAC Directives - It was also suggested that the committee come up with an amount of TAC implementation that it was comfortable with. The draft "next steps" from the first TAC strategic plan indicates a definite role for BATS that the committee may not be comfortable with.

Review of Minutes - The minutes from Friday, May 3, 2002 were read and approved, with changes to Smart Carts stored in Visual Arts, not Arts & Letters. It was suggested that work on the Technology Expo begin in the summer if it is to be done in the fall.

The meeting ended at 3:30 p.m. The next meeting will be on Friday, May 24, 2002 at 1:15 p.m.

Minutes organized by Gini Ashton, Kim Cousins and Michelle Behne

Back to Top


Technology Advisory Council
Technology Advisory Council
Technology Advisory Council
  Technology Advisory Council